|
sql
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
How to Use Fixed memory Size in SQL Server 2005I will label myself a total newbie and i desperately need direction. Here it goes...I installed SQL Server 2005. I am trying to follow direction and set the memory to use fixed memory size. I can not find this option anywhere. I have the memory tab on which i have Server memory options. here i have "Use AWE to allocate memory" , mimunim server memory, maximum server memory and other memory options section. Normally as per the what i understood, i should also have the option to use fixed size on this tab...but i dont!!! I thought this might have been because maybe, i dont have advanced options, so i ran a script from the internet to set my show options to '1'. This also did not change anything. So can anyone please help me do what i need to so that i can have the "Use fixed memory size" option! Thanks in advance. Sheinaz Normally you would set the min and max server memory allocations.
If you have enough memory that you will be using AWE (> 4GB), the min server memory allocation is ignored. If you need more information, refer to these articles: Configuration -Memory, Adjust Memory Usage http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;q321363 Configuration -Memory, AWE, Not usable < 4GB http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/c/c/9cc42e30-538b-4451-8fdb-7134a004f94c/Adv64BitEnv.doc Configuration -Memory, Can not use more than 2GB of memory http://www.support.microsoft.com/?id=811891 Configuration -Memory, Large Memory Support Is Available in Windows 2000 (AWE) http://www.support.microsoft.com/?id=283037 Configuration -Memory, SQL Server 7 & 2000 memory usage http://www.support.microsoft.com/?id=321363 Configuration -Memory, SQL Server Memory http://sqljunkies.com/Tutorial/0D4FF40A-695C-4327-A41B-F9F2FE2D58F6.scuk Configuration -Memory, SQL Server to use more than 2 GB of physical memory http://support.microsoft.com/kb/274750/ Configuration -Memory, Using AWE Memory http://www.sql-server-performance.com/awe_memory.asp -- Show quoteHide quoteArnie Rowland, Ph.D. Westwood Consulting, Inc Most good judgment comes from experience. Most experience comes from bad judgment. - Anonymous You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the top yourself. - H. Norman Schwarzkopf <shei***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1161900531.090882.263030@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Hi all, > > I will label myself a total newbie and i desperately need direction. > > Here it goes...I installed SQL Server 2005. I am trying to follow > direction and set the memory to use fixed memory size. I can not find > this option anywhere. I have the memory tab on which i have Server > memory options. here i have "Use AWE to allocate memory" , mimunim > server memory, maximum server memory and other memory options section. > Normally as per the what i understood, i should also have the option > to use fixed size on this tab...but i dont!!! > > I thought this might have been because maybe, i dont have advanced > options, so i ran a script from the internet to set my show options to > '1'. This also did not change anything. > > So can anyone please help me do what i need to so that i can have the > "Use fixed memory size" option! > > Thanks in advance. > > Sheinaz > Hi
sp_configure still has the options to set values for 'min server memory' and 'max server memory', see Books Online for more! John Show quoteHide quote "shei***@gmail.com" wrote: > Hi all, > > I will label myself a total newbie and i desperately need direction. > > Here it goes...I installed SQL Server 2005. I am trying to follow > direction and set the memory to use fixed memory size. I can not find > this option anywhere. I have the memory tab on which i have Server > memory options. here i have "Use AWE to allocate memory" , mimunim > server memory, maximum server memory and other memory options section. > Normally as per the what i understood, i should also have the option > to use fixed size on this tab...but i dont!!! > > I thought this might have been because maybe, i dont have advanced > options, so i ran a script from the internet to set my show options to > '1'. This also did not change anything. > > So can anyone please help me do what i need to so that i can have the > "Use fixed memory size" option! > > Thanks in advance. > > Sheinaz > > Hi everyone,
thanks for all your feedback. I set min=max and things already look better. I figured out the reason i dont have the lock memory option is because the version of SQL Server 2005 was installed on top of the trial version, so it was not a clean install, and so possibly this is the reason why all my options are not available to me. the 2005 trial version is 9...something and the SQL Server 2005 -licensed version is 8. something. I guess that's the difference. But already, with your suggestions i was able to reduce mem usage of the cpu so we're on the right track... i will probably do a clean install later on to get everythign right. Thanks again! sheinaz On 27 Oct 2006 06:51:51 -0700, shei***@gmail.com wrote:
>I figured out the reason i dont have the lock memory option is I do not believe there IS an option for fixed memory other than>because the version of SQL Server 2005 was installed on top of the >trial version, so it was not a clean install, and so possibly this is >the reason why all my options are not available to me. setting min and max to the same number. At least I could not find any alternative in my copy of Management Studio (which was a clean install) or the documentation (which has been updated). Roy > I do not believe there IS an option for fixed memory other than Correct. EM had such an option in the GUI and all it did was to set max and min to the same value. > setting min and max to the same number. Show quoteHide quote :-) -- Show quoteHide quoteTibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/ "Roy Harvey" <roy_har***@snet.net> wrote in message news:qu74k2l4vgv2vj2568ed1c2qq3h47gj4e7@4ax.com... > On 27 Oct 2006 06:51:51 -0700, shei***@gmail.com wrote: > >>I figured out the reason i dont have the lock memory option is >>because the version of SQL Server 2005 was installed on top of the >>trial version, so it was not a clean install, and so possibly this is >>the reason why all my options are not available to me. > > I do not believe there IS an option for fixed memory other than > setting min and max to the same number. At least I could not find any > alternative in my copy of Management Studio (which was a clean > install) or the documentation (which has been updated). > > Roy Something is not right here!
"the SQL Server 2005 -licensed version is 8. something. " ALL versions of SQL Server 2005 are 9.something! As far as I am aware, there are NO versions of SQL 2005 that are version 8.something. -- Show quoteHide quoteArnie Rowland, Ph.D. Westwood Consulting, Inc Most good judgment comes from experience. Most experience comes from bad judgment. - Anonymous You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the top yourself. - H. Norman Schwarzkopf <shei***@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1161957111.743790.5630@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > Hi everyone, > thanks for all your feedback. I set min=max and things already look > better. I figured out the reason i dont have the lock memory option is > because the version of SQL Server 2005 was installed on top of the > trial version, so it was not a clean install, and so possibly this is > the reason why all my options are not available to me. the 2005 trial > version is 9...something and the SQL Server 2005 -licensed version is > 8. something. I guess that's the difference. > > But already, with your suggestions i was able to reduce mem usage of > the cpu so we're on the right track... i will probably do a clean > install later on to get everythign right. > > Thanks again! > > sheinaz > this is what is bugging me so much!!
i do not understand it either. especially since i have two purchased SQL Server 2005 CDs and they are supposed to be exactly the same! either way, i believe i can limit the mem usage by making min=max. thanks for all your help everyone! I gave up tryign to figure out why the version numbers are different. it beats me. i ever clean my entire machine and reformatted it and started from scratch to make sure of everything. argh! i now have entek software problems to deal with...any one have any idea where i can ask those questions? thanks shen Arnie Rowland wrote: Show quoteHide quote > Something is not right here! > > "the SQL Server 2005 -licensed version is 8. something. " > > ALL versions of SQL Server 2005 are 9.something! As far as I am aware, there > are NO versions of SQL 2005 that are version 8.something. > > -- > Arnie Rowland, Ph.D. > Westwood Consulting, Inc > > Most good judgment comes from experience. > Most experience comes from bad judgment. > - Anonymous > > You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the > top yourself. > - H. Norman Schwarzkopf > > > <shei***@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1161957111.743790.5630@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > Hi everyone, > > thanks for all your feedback. I set min=max and things already look > > better. I figured out the reason i dont have the lock memory option is > > because the version of SQL Server 2005 was installed on top of the > > trial version, so it was not a clean install, and so possibly this is > > the reason why all my options are not available to me. the 2005 trial > > version is 9...something and the SQL Server 2005 -licensed version is > > 8. something. I guess that's the difference. > > > > But already, with your suggestions i was able to reduce mem usage of > > the cpu so we're on the right track... i will probably do a clean > > install later on to get everythign right. > > > > Thanks again! > > > > sheinaz > >
Deadlocks and trace 1204
Copy Database Wizard Problems Load question: would this be a trivial or non-trivial query for a SQL Server installation to calcula Fatal error exception after SP installation How to identify the progress of running query Is it safe to bcp sysindexes out and in Differential Backup disproportionately large Can't see D partition kb 328551 - splitting tempdb question? How much performance gained by qualifying tables with dbo. in the database? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||