|
sql
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SQL 2000 and 2005 On Save Box
Are there any issues with 2000 and 2005 SQL on the same server? Have a
machine with both and the perception is that the server became unstable with the 2005 install, although I'm not convinced that if it is unstable the 2005 install caused it. Box has 4 Gig RAM. Hello Jeffery,
There should not be any problem running 2000 & 2005 SQL on same server. Cheers!! Show quoteHide quote "Jeffery Rehm" wrote: > Are there any issues with 2000 and 2005 SQL on the same server? Have a > machine with both and the perception is that the server became unstable with > the 2005 install, although I'm not convinced that if it is unstable the 2005 > install caused it. Box has 4 Gig RAM. > > > Thanks for the reply. Would you know of anyplace where I might find some
'official' documentation that discusses this? Show quoteHide quote "FM" <F*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4FFFDFCD-9F36-4257-A5E0-81FF7AA407B6@microsoft.com... > Hello Jeffery, > > There should not be any problem running 2000 & 2005 SQL on same server. > > Cheers!! > > "Jeffery Rehm" wrote: > >> Are there any issues with 2000 and 2005 SQL on the same server? Have a >> machine with both and the perception is that the server became unstable >> with >> the 2005 install, although I'm not convinced that if it is unstable the >> 2005 >> install caused it. Box has 4 Gig RAM. >> >> >> Jeffery,
The focus of this is upgrading, but with comments on side-by-side 2000 and 2005 instances in the topic "Upgrading to the SQL Server 2005 Database Engine" http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/sqlupgrd.mspx And from the MSDN blogs: http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlblog/archive/2006/09/27/co-existence-of-sql-2005-with-sql-2000.aspx FWIW, RLF Show quoteHide quote "Jeffery Rehm" <abs@spam.never> wrote in message news:uWi1B75WJHA.4560@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Thanks for the reply. Would you know of anyplace where I might find some > 'official' documentation that discusses this? > > > > "FM" <F*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:4FFFDFCD-9F36-4257-A5E0-81FF7AA407B6@microsoft.com... >> Hello Jeffery, >> >> There should not be any problem running 2000 & 2005 SQL on same server. >> >> Cheers!! >> >> "Jeffery Rehm" wrote: >> >>> Are there any issues with 2000 and 2005 SQL on the same server? Have a >>> machine with both and the perception is that the server became unstable >>> with >>> the 2005 install, although I'm not convinced that if it is unstable the >>> 2005 >>> install caused it. Box has 4 Gig RAM. >>> >>> >>> > > Great! Thanks.
Show quoteHide quote "Russell Fields" <russellfie***@nomail.com> wrote in message news:eBvNOG6WJHA.1336@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Jeffery, > > The focus of this is upgrading, but with comments on side-by-side 2000 and > 2005 instances in the topic > "Upgrading to the SQL Server 2005 Database Engine" > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/sqlupgrd.mspx > > And from the MSDN blogs: > http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlblog/archive/2006/09/27/co-existence-of-sql-2005-with-sql-2000.aspx > > FWIW, > RLF > > "Jeffery Rehm" <abs@spam.never> wrote in message > news:uWi1B75WJHA.4560@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Thanks for the reply. Would you know of anyplace where I might find some >> 'official' documentation that discusses this? >> >> >> >> "FM" <F*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:4FFFDFCD-9F36-4257-A5E0-81FF7AA407B6@microsoft.com... >>> Hello Jeffery, >>> >>> There should not be any problem running 2000 & 2005 SQL on same server. >>> >>> Cheers!! >>> >>> "Jeffery Rehm" wrote: >>> >>>> Are there any issues with 2000 and 2005 SQL on the same server? Have a >>>> machine with both and the perception is that the server became unstable >>>> with >>>> the 2005 install, although I'm not convinced that if it is unstable the >>>> 2005 >>>> install caused it. Box has 4 Gig RAM. >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > Jeffery Rehm wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > Great! Thanks. When you installed 2005 - did you set the min/max memory settings for > > "Russell Fields" <russellfie***@nomail.com> wrote in message > news:eBvNOG6WJHA.1336@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Jeffery, >> >> The focus of this is upgrading, but with comments on side-by-side 2000 and >> 2005 instances in the topic >> "Upgrading to the SQL Server 2005 Database Engine" >> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/sqlupgrd.mspx >> >> And from the MSDN blogs: >> http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlblog/archive/2006/09/27/co-existence-of-sql-2005-with-sql-2000.aspx >> >> FWIW, >> RLF >> >> "Jeffery Rehm" <abs@spam.never> wrote in message >> news:uWi1B75WJHA.4560@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> Thanks for the reply. Would you know of anyplace where I might find some >>> 'official' documentation that discusses this? >>> >>> >>> >>> "FM" <F*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >>> news:4FFFDFCD-9F36-4257-A5E0-81FF7AA407B6@microsoft.com... >>>> Hello Jeffery, >>>> >>>> There should not be any problem running 2000 & 2005 SQL on same server. >>>> >>>> Cheers!! >>>> >>>> "Jeffery Rehm" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Are there any issues with 2000 and 2005 SQL on the same server? Have a >>>>> machine with both and the perception is that the server became unstable >>>>> with >>>>> the 2005 install, although I'm not convinced that if it is unstable the >>>>> 2005 >>>>> install caused it. Box has 4 Gig RAM. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> > > both instances? If not, this could be part of the problems you are having. At least, that is something you should check and verify. Jeff  
Other interesting topics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
