|
sql
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
replicate image of DB at a remote siteHello,
I'm searching for information on replicating DB for disater recovery. I read online that some people do not recommed the SQL Server replication procedure. Can you recommend a software or a good way to replicate DB to remote server? Thanks. You can use Database Mirroring (SQL Server 2005 or later) or Log Shipping.
More about Database Mirroring: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188712.aspx http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/archive/2007/02/13/60091.aspx http://www.sql-server-performance.com/articles/clustering/mirroring_2005_p1.aspx More about Log Shipping: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/logship1.mspx http://www.sql-server-performance.com/articles/clustering/log_shipping_70_p1.aspx Database mirroring for a remote site is probably not a good idea.
Log shipping is much more acceptable though. Plamen Ratchev wrote: Show quoteHide quote > You can use Database Mirroring (SQL Server 2005 or later) or Log Shipping. > > More about Database Mirroring: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188712.aspx > http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/archive/2007/02/13/60091.aspx > http://www.sql-server-performance.com/articles/clustering/mirroring_2005_p1.aspx > > > More about Log Shipping: > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/logship1.mspx > > http://www.sql-server-performance.com/articles/clustering/log_shipping_70_p1.aspx > > Depends. We have remote sites with very good connectivity where database
mirroring is preferred because of the automatic failover capabilities. I've seen mirroring, log shipping and replication used for DR in my last 2
contracts and each has its own particular advantages and disadvantages. For your case there are some key questions that should help to narrow down the appropriate technologies: Do you require automatic failover? What is the minimum latency you can afford? Is the DR site to be used for reporting as well? Do you have a reasonable amount of time to administer it? What version/edition of SQL Server are you using? Do you have an extra server which could be used as a witness? If you can answer these, then we'll be able to better help you out. Cheers, Paul Ibison One thing that you need to understand is that replication was originally not
designed as a disaster recovery solution. It is a means to bring the data nearer to the data consumer. In SQL Server 2000, for example, since log shipping is not available in Standard Edition, a lot of people use replication as a disaster recovery solution but should take the risk of not having the same database schema as that of the primary database Show quoteHide quote "fiaola" <fia***@mail.com> wrote in message news:%23IuhVsnVJHA.1244@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Hello, > > I'm searching for information on replicating DB for disater recovery. I > read online that some people do not recommed the SQL Server replication > procedure. Can you recommend a software or a good way to replicate DB to > remote server? > > Thanks. >
Cursor Help
Disaster Recovery Options Problem in sysdatabases Is it possible to associate sql login with network address? SQL Server 2005 Script Out User Permission Prod-> Dev FT Index - Avoid Noise Words how to ignore error.... Defrag SQL Server Files recovery mode help ? SQL Server 2005 Rebuild Error: 8152 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||